Candidate Statement
If elected as a DPS committee member, I would be thrilled to serve the community that so greatly served me. I attended 13 DPS meetings since 2003, and they remain my favorite conference, with their spirit of friendly professionalism that makes our field stand out. May the story of my first DPS, 2003 in Monterey, CA, serve as an illustration.
Those were interesting times, with an outsider candidate, who had never held elected office, running for governor of the state we were in. I was a first-year grad student and intimidated by this large room full of people whose names I had read on papers. Until a speaker in “my” session opened his talk with a faux Austrian accent. "Hi, I'm Andy, and I'm running for governor." Hilarity ensued, my stage-fright was gone. This was a friendly crowd, and my accent would only help my talk. I left the conference with very constructive feedback, with exciting new ideas, and with email addresses of people who would soon enough turn into collaborators and friends.
Today, we live in times that are just as interesting, with isolationism on the rise across the globe. My candidacy is a reminder that, like science itself, DPS is international and relies on the free exchange of ideas. Space missions, which are so critical for our field, depend increasingly on international collaboration. Yet, European DPS members have been unrepresented in the committee since 2009.
Based on personal experience, I will emphasize the perspective of DPS members outside of North America. As an example, I propose a straightforward improvement of the Hartmann travel grants, one of our most important tools to make DPS meetings accessible to early-career scientists. I obtained a Hartmann grant for the 2003 meeting in Monterey, CA, but it was so small compared to trans-Atlantic airfare Berlin-California, it was not very effective in getting me travel permission. On the flipside, the 2005 grant for the meeting in Cambridge, UK, (a one-hour flight from Berlin) was far more generous
than I needed it to be. Both grants made sense for US participants, for whom they were tailored. I propose we add a flat dollar amount to Hartmann travel grant if grantees have to cross an ocean in order to reach the meeting (to be discussed: does Hawaii qualify as trans-Pacific?). In 2018, this will benefit Europeans going to Knoxville. In 2019, this will benefit Americans going to Genève. In both cases, the system will be fairer and more efficient, with minimal extra overhead (one extra check-box in the form, one extra if-statement in the calculation of the grant).