Candidate Statement
I would be positively honored to represent our community on the DPS Committee.In my estimation, we need a growing budget, we need to insure our community stability, and we need to invest for the future. Thus, I offer the following three goals that would guide my service to the DPS community:
- Sustained growth in both the Planetary Science Budget and the NASA topline through advocacy on behalf of the membership—this is our community “budget.”
- Improving the impact of the DPS as the largest professional organization for Planetary Sciences by increasing our role within the AAS, and interactions with partner societies and industry—this is our community “insurance.”
- Improving support and networks for early career planetary scientists, particularly in the coming “decade of darkness” for outer planet missions—this is our community “investment.”
In 2011, the planetary science community, and in particular the sub-disciplines who are generally active within the DPS, were hit hard by fiscal reprioritization. My own involvement with the Federal Relations Subcommittee started just after that, motivated by the fact that the noise floor on the challenging budget had been raised, but that there was a lack of congruence in what was being communicated to Congress and the Administration. Due in part to the concerted efforts of the FRS over several years with concise, consistent messaging and bringing together that message across many interested groups, we are now reaping the benefits of quality communication and community prioritization—we began in 2012 supporting a minimum $1.5B FY14 for Planetary, and now we have a proposed budget from the House above 1.6B for Planetary Science. I see consistent messaging as an essential priority that the DPS Committee should maintain in order to avoid future budgetary problems. Insuring that our message is heard and is effective also means going beyond our internal priorities to working with the AAS in a productive manner, and continuing to collaborate with AGU, the AAAS, and industry partners, giving us strength in numbers and synergy across science that speaks with one voice. Focusing on a strategy for insuring the future of our work is of particular importance in the near term, as we face a changing Administration while many important and new missions are to be proposed and selected. Now is not the time to rest on our laurels!
I am also deeply concerned about the support available for early career (EC) researchers. I’ve been very active in trying to ensure that EC folks have more representation in OPAG and other forums, but we cannot lose track of this goal. Today’s graduate students and postdocs are tomorrow’s PIs. Phase D/E mission spending is declining, R&A competition is fierce, and limited access to postdoc and graduate positions threatens even the current crop of young investigators. In the next ten years, it is unclear what stop gaps may be available to support in particular the already dwindling number of EC outer solar system investigators given that any missions will be in the development phase, and senior investigators rolling off of Cassini and Juno funds will only increase competition. Young scientists need more than just a chance to do their science, they need their own voices in decision making, too. I think this is a critical role that the DPS can uniquely play in preserving the health of our community and I would like to help us facilitate more Early Career involvement by making an effort to find sustainable ways to increase DPS funding for EC participants for science and strategic meetings (e.g. AGs), and advocating within the community, NASA and the funding process to preserve opportunities for young investigators.
I am thrilled to have been asked to run for DPS office. DPS 2003 in Monterey was my very first scientific conference, and kick started my involvement with the organization and has defined the path of my career, a favor I hope to repay to the community through this service.