Services, Roles, and Activities
- Secretary, High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American Astronomical Society (2012-2015)
- Chair, COSPAR Panel on Capacity-Building Workshop Fellowship Program (2010-present)
- Member, Astro-H Science Office (2010-present)
- Member, Chandra Users’ Committee (2006-2008)
I have led or co-organized eight conferences & workshops, beginning with “X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas: Theory, Experiment & Observation” in 2004 and including workshops on X-rays & Charge Exchange, AtomDB workshops, the 1st CfA Lab Astrophysics Workshops, and most recently the CXC workshop on High-Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy.
Peer-review referee for Nature, The Astrophysical Journal, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Advances in Space Research, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, Spectroscopy Letters, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Reviews of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, and The Astronomical Journal
Candidate Statement
Laboratory astrophysics sits at a triple boundary, connecting laboratory measurements, observational data, and astronomical facilities. The connection between the first two of these has always been well known, but the issue of facilities – e.g. mirrors, detectors, and spectrographs – is not. I believe we can serve both the astronomical and the LAD communities by working to improve communications in both areas.
Beginning with the first boundary, the LAD exists in part to make connections between those who can perform measurements and those observers who need data. This may seem simple, but in many cases the observers have only a hazy understanding of the limitations of existing atomic, molecular, nuclear, or optical data, while experimentalists in turn cannot hope to keep up with all of the rapid changes of goals, facilities, and techniques involved in astrophysical observations. Maintaining the LAD summer workshops and expanding them to other special sessions will be key to removing the haze and informing all sides about what data exists now, what could be measured easily, and what requires long-term efforts.
The second boundary connects not to individual observations or issues, but rather to existing and more importantly future capabilities. All LAD scientists know the frustration of applying to programs that are woefully underfunded to understand results from observatories that cost orders of magnitude more than is provided for laboratory work. The astronomical community will soon begin work on the 2020 Decadal Survey, with many new ideas and observatories considered. LAD members need to be involved from the outset to ensure that all lab data requirements are known – and included in the cost of the facility. LAD cannot solve the funding problem itself, but we can ensure that news of observatories and their potential laboratory astrophysics needs reaches the membership via the LAD newsletter. If elected, I will work to reach out to the leaders of existing observatories and new concepts to make these connections.