Candidate Statement
As the largest professional planetary society, the DPS is the primary voice of
the community of planetary scientists. In terms of organizing our scientific
communications and advocating our interests to the US government, the DPS
remains an essential organization. As Chair my priority would be to modernize
and streamline the DPS' finances, meetings, and online systems to ensure its
continued effectiveness for a long and fruitful future.
Our greatest concern today is the NASA budget for planetary science. The
Federal Relations Subcommittee (FRS), led by Makenzie Lystrup, has done an
amazing job these past few years under trying circumstances. Thus I see the job
of the Chair to be ensuring that Makenzie and the FRS have all the resources
that they need continue to engage with Congress and, particularly, the
administration regarding funding priorities. I will also work closely with our
parent organization, the AAS, to ensure that we do not work at cross-purposes
with one another. To help the FRS do its job, however, we all need to keep
doing ours by reaching out to the public to communicate the discoveries that are
the fruits of public funding to the taxpayers.
To continue to serve the planetary community the DPS must keep its own house --
particularly its finances -- in order. The DPS nearly went under in 2009, only
to be rescued by a $250,000 federal bailout. That is embarrassing. And it is
not a sustainable way to run a professional society. Although we are in good
financial health today, we must never be put in such a position again,
regardless of the state of the economy. To that end, we need to be careful to
prevent inertia toward overly cavernous venues for the annual Meetings
that comprise the overwhelming majority of our budget. The Committee should
always consider at least two venues when deciding on each meeting location. And
we also need to look more closely at holding meetings in small-to-medium sized
cities that could be more cost-effective for the size of our gathering.
But the best thing that we can do for the financial health of the DPS is to
diversify our revenue base. Right now over 90% of our annual income derives
from the yearly meeting, with dues providing a small but important supplement.
We need an extra source of money to provide stability in the case of a
money-losing meeting, to enable new initiatives, and to allow the DPS the agency
to pursue its interests.
Icarus the Division-sponsored journal, should provide us that new revenue.
As a DPS Committee member, I initiated the currently ongoing reevaluation of our
relationship with the Division-sponsored journal. While other societies own
their journals (AAS owns ApJ and AJ, AGU owns GRL and JGR), Icarus is owned by
Elsevier, a private company. As such Elsevier runs Icarus to maximize its
profit. As a professional society, I think that the DPS needs to have some
control over its own journal, including a share of those profits. Therefore I
support continued efforts by the DPS to negotiate with Elsevier to tie our
continued sponsorship of Icarus to (1) direct revenue payments from Elsevier
to the DPS general fund, and (2) complete autonomy and authority for the
DPS-appointed editor of Icarus (presently Phil Nicholson).
I would like to address two other issues that could be supported by any
additional revenue. First, I want to fix our voting system. Turnout in DPS
elections hovers around 20%, well lower than back when we mailed paper ballots.
We all know why this is: the email that you get to vote is not a direct link,
but rather it requires that you either remember or look up your DPS ID number
and log in before you can vote. When we asked the AAS to fix this issue in the
past, they blew us off. Now we will have money to contract to or hire whomever
we need to solve the problem ourselves. The other use of money that I propose
is to implement an online forum for DPS issues. Right now the DPS leadership
communicates with the membership by way of the Member's Meeting at the annual
conference. Unfortunately the meeting has historically been sparsely attended,
and the attendees skew heavily to established scientists. To help address these
problems, I propose to complement the Member's Meeting with a web-based
discussion system that would both increase and broaden membership participation
in Division matters.
Since its inception as a Division in 1968, the DPS has served its membership
through both flush and trying circumstances. I would like the chance to
implement the ideas that I have described here to help ensure that the DPS can
continue to serve us all for the foreseeable future.